CCI

ABOUT THE CONFERENCE
This conference aims to gather postgraduate students and early career researchers from Australia, New Zealand and Asia to explore both what it means when we call ourselves cultural researchers and how people coming from different academic backgrounds see the nature and challenges of conducting cultural research in the 21st century. We encourage participants from all cultural-focused perspectives, including (but not limited to) cultural sociology, anthropology, cultural studies, film studies, media studies, museum studies, heritage studies and art history.
Papers are invited on individuals’ projects, and presenters will be asked to reflect on how their research contributes to strengthening the agenda of cultural research. As a starting point for participants, it is suggested that in a world that is increasingly globalised, diverse and technologically mediated, new knowledge practices are required to address the cultural challenges and contradictions that exist in the 21st century. In particular, focus for this conference will be on generating genuine solutions to social and cultural problems through forging accessible, transparent and practicable forms of cultural understanding.
Topics, for example, may include:
• intercultural dialogue and interaction;
• community collaborations;
• innovative methodologies for cultural research;
• virtual, digital and new media communications;
• new knowledge production and scholarly work;
• problematising nature vs. culture;
• practising social and cultural inclusion;
• cultural research beyond national borders;
• knowledge exchange between scholarly and policy arenas;
• the empirical turn in cultural research; cultural flows;
• the critique of identity;
• processes of critique and their relationship to cultural change;
• interdisciplinarity and cultural research;
• globalization and cultural research;
• professionalization of cultural research;

http://cci.edu.au/presentations/cci-20-symposium-5-6-july-2010-vodpodcasts-available

the arts and 21st century skills

http://www.mmischools.com/Newsletters/MmisXtra.aspx?NewsletterID=2115#1

Gardner + Cognitive Ed Journal link

Howard Gardner - Future Minds

Part of the series: RSA Lectures
More to view/download/share: downloads | links

Part of the series RSA Lectures
http://www.teachers.tv/videos/howard-gardner-future-minds

School Matters - Generation Y: Young School Leaders

Part of the series: School Matters
More to view/download/share: downloads | links

Part of the series School Matters

Professor David Hargreaves looks at how digital media is working in schools, for both pupils and staff, and argues that Generation Y, those born in the digital age, should become school leaders.

http://www.teachers.tv/videos/generation-y-young-school-leaders  

NAVA + National Curriculum Vis Art

 Notes on the History of Art Ed ~ (mostly American)
http://www.noteaccess.com/APPROACHES/ArtEd/History/index.htm


Background to the involvement of the NAAE in the development of a National Curriculum in the Arts

In 2008 the Australian Government embarked on the development of a National Curriculum. Initially, announcements were made about the development of learning areas in Phase 1 (English, mathematics, science and history) and subsequently Phase 2 (geography and languages) were released. Beyond this, there was no guarantee of any further phases of development and certainly no guarantee of the inclusion of the arts.
In 2007, in a joint statement made by the Ministerial Council for Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) and Cultural Ministers Council (CMC) it was stated that:

All children and young people should have a high quality arts education in every phase of learning. (Ministerial Council for Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs and Cultural Ministers Council, 2007, 5).¹

Establishment of NAAE
The National Affiliation of Arts Educators (NAAE) Inc was established in 1989 with the support of the Joint Council of Cultural and Education Ministers. It has a long history of working with government, being instrumental in ensuring that the Arts were established as one of the eight key learning areas in the Australian curriculum. This group had significant carriage of the consultation and writing of the 1992 The arts – a statement on the arts for Australian schools and the companion document The arts – a curriculum profile for Australian schools.
NAAE was subsequently provided with funding from the Department of Education & Training to employ a full-time researcher for three years (until 1996), and maintained its activity after funding ceased, holding its AGM, making submissions to federal inquiries, publishing papers and advocating for Australian arts education research. A teleconference occurred in August 2008 in response to the announcement of the disciplines targeted for inclusion in the national curriculum.
The first meeting of NAAE concerning the National Curriculum occurred in October 2008. It was decided to change the name from the National Affiliation of Arts Educators to the National Advocates for Arts Education to better reflect the group’s work in getting the arts recognised as a vital part of any national curriculum. It was confirmed that the artforms and their representation would be: Dance (Ausdance); Drama (Drama Australia); Music (Australian Society for Music Education and the Music Council of Australia) and; Visual Arts (Art Education Australia and the National Association for the Visual Arts). The Australian Teachers of Media (ATOM) were original members of NAAE, and rejoined in December 2008.
At this time a strategy was developed for an advocacy plan that targeted significant members of both political parties whose portfolios were concerned with education and the arts. Letters were prepared introducing NAAE and requesting meetings with the NAAE when Parliament was sitting in Canberra. In November 2008, the NAAE was able to meet with Minister Peter Garrett, Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s education advisor, Minister Kim Carr’s education advisor and representatives from the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. NAAE provided a two-page executive summary position which called for the inclusion of the arts as a learning area in Phase 2 of the development of the National Curriculum.
At the same time, NAAE made strong representations to the government for the inclusion of the arts in the Early Years Learning Framework which deals with the education of children from birth to 8.
Approximately a week after the Canberra meetings, MCEETYA released the Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Goals are described that include arts-rich aspects such as the cultural, creative abilities and the aesthetic. Importantly, however, the declaration lists a range of learning areas including the arts (performing and visual).
In December 2008, following the Canberra meetings, NAAE issued a media release outlining its position. This was taken up by the ABC AM program in January 2009, with subsequent articles and letters to the editor in The Age newspaper in support of this position.
The NAAE subsequently wrote to Professor Barry McGaw, Chair of the Interim National Curriculum Board (NCB), requesting the arts be included in the National Curriculum. Professor McGaw informed NAAE that MCEETYA determines the scope of the National Curriculum. When questioned for further clarification, it was noted that additional subject areas would be presented to MCEETYA for approval at their mid-year meeting. Letters were also sent to all MCEETYA Ministers by NAAE member associations, the Australian Academy of the Humanities and the Council for the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS), the Museum of Contemporary Art and the Australian Council for University Art and Design Schools.
Prior to Minister Garrett’s announcement on 17 April 2009 that the arts would be included in Phase 2 of the National Curriculum, the NAAE had met with Mr Rob Randall – Acting General Manager, Curriculum for the National Curriculum Board. Mr Randall suggested that NAAE discuss and prepare a position that could be presented for the provision of arts education in Australia, specifically targeting questions that related to how many artforms students must study and for how long this study should be. Mr Randall also suggested to NAAE that it undertakes an environmental scan or audit of arts curriculum from around the country and develop a position that summarised what would be considered essential content for each of the artforms.
This work has resulted in literally hours of discussion among NAAE members and has produced a set of recommendations from NAAE to the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA – formerly the interim National Curriculum Board) together with overviews of each of the artforms. The NAAE has made the strongest representations to ACARA staff that each artform must be considered separately and that its own histories, traditions, content and pedagogies be acknowledged with separate curriculum. The NAAE supports the development of content in each artform and does not support a generic “arts” curriculum.
NAAE has maintained a healthy relationship with ACARA through two further meetings with Rob Randall in June and in August of 2009. At the August meeting the Project Manager for the Arts, Ms Josephine Wise, was also in attendance.


Consultation with peak bodies
Each member of the NAAE has consulted with their constituents in a range of ways on the development of overviews and the recommendations. A summary of strategies for consultation is listed in Appendix A.
In addition, consultation has occurred with the Australian Primary Principals’ Association (APPA) through meetings with its president, correspondence and a successful teleconference. As a result, APPA has informed NAAE of its support of the work undertaken so far and its in-principle support of the recommendations that NAAE is providing to ACARA. It is important to note that the NAAE undertakes to continue providing ACARA with strategic advice when ACARA’s process of curriculum development and consultation commences.

NATIONAL ADVOCATES FOR ARTS EDUCATION (NAAE)

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ARTS LEARNING IN THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM

The Arts (Performing and Visual) are identified in the Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians (December 2008) as a learning area with a specific discipline base. These are included as part of the Declaration’s goals to achieve a world-class curriculum. 
How might the Arts (Performing and Visual) be implemented in the National Curriculum from 2012?
NAAE’s long-term aspiration is for all young Australians to have access to sequential and continuous learning in each artform. However, in order to offer flexibility and a realistic approach, and recognising the challenges of the crowded curriculum and implications of teacher expertise, the NAAE recommends the following for this next important phase of curriculum development in arts education:

1. Primary and secondary students should have sequential and continuous learning provisions in at least one artform from the field of Performing Arts (Dance, Drama, Music) and one artform from the field of the Visual Arts (Visual Arts¹, Media), selected by the school, i.e. at least two art forms will be chosen for continuous and sequential learning as a minimum for arts learning.²
2. This will enable students to demonstrate achievement, progression and development in content (skills, knowledge, understanding) identified for at least two artforms. Teachers should report on student achievement within the school’s chosen two artforms.
3. This approach will facilitate choice for schools, taking account of staffing, resources, community interests and provision. It will also support a ‘whole school’ approach to build strengths, expertise and the capacity to implement arts curriculum.
4. The first years of schooling should build on the Early Years Learning Framework to provide a broad and interrelated approach to the arts that acknowledges the richness this can bring to young learners.
5. Throughout the primary years, in addition to the two selected artforms, students should also have rich learning experiences in the remaining three artforms, with schools reporting achievement in these artforms in less formal ways.
6. In the secondary years, at least two artforms, one from the Performing Arts and one from the Visual Arts, should be offered in sequential and continuous courses. Provision should also be made for the remaining three artforms, enabling students to exercise choice.
7. In the senior years, it is desirable that schools offer courses in all five artforms and for students to be able to specialise in the artforms of their choice.

¹ NAAE’s views with regard to Visual Arts and Design are still under consideration
² NAAE was advised to follow the terminology of the 2008 Melbourne Declaration as an 'enabling' document, but NAAE's views on the Melbourne Declaration's division of the arts into 'performing and visual' remain under consideration.


Discussion
The NAAE recognises the importance for all students in Australia to have access to sequential, developmental and continuous learning in each of the artforms. NAAE also recognises that existing school structures, competing priorities, existing resources and expertise limits this goal. The recommendations listed above provide for what would be considered to be the minimum acceptable standard for the implementation of the national curriculum in the arts. A statement such as this strengthens the provisions that currently exist in many states and territories around the country.
The NAAE would also acknowledge the importance of the Arts in early childhood education and recommends that any curriculum that is to be developed should build upon the Early Years Learning Framework and allow for an arts-rich learning environment that reflects good practice and pedagogy with children of this age group. This position also intends to promote and enhance the provision of arts learning in the secondary curriculum and supports a notion that a continuum of learning be developed that allows for increasing degrees of specialisation as students progress through to the senior years.
In addition to this, the NAAE advocates for a review of pre-service teacher education. It notes through a number of studies the inadequate provisions and training provided by tertiary institutions are clearly not preparing teachers for the demands of the existing curriculum, let alone a new National Curriculum.

APPENDIX A

Consultation with peak bodies  
   

Art and the Knowledge Environment

Taken from art&education

Research degrees in art practice have been established at Master’s level since the 1980s and studio-based PhD degrees emerged during the 1990s in the UK and Australia, attracting major artists and artist-academics as well as younger artists using the university context, with its seminars, critiques and interrogative engagement, as a means of further their practice.

The Faculty of Art & Design at Monash University has been developing formats for research degrees in art and design for the last fifteen years. Monash is one of Australia’s major research universities and all its academic disciplines are required to contribute to the university’s research objectives. The Faculty addressed this demand by developing an approach to visual research which has developed into the largest, practice based research degree program in the country and one of the largest in the world. The problem was to recognize the quality and achievement of professional visual production and to reformulate art production as research without compromising its quality as art.

The Monash research degree program is structured around an exhibition, which is the outcome of the research process. This is supported by a dissertation which bridges the expectations of professional art practice and university expectations of PhD degrees, to contextualize the visual research. Coursework components facilitate the integration of practice and theory, but the dominant emphasis is on the development of a body of studio research, for examination. With over 250 candidates at Masters and PhD level, the program’s success has been as a result of the support system developed to translate the expectations of professional art practice into research. The methodology coursework subjects explore issues of terminology and ways for visual research to be contextualized, to demonstrate its innovation. They also develop a theoretical context by which professional production can be taken further into the realms of research and cultural production. Seminars and critiques underpin the creative interaction within the program. The outcome has been a community of artist-scholars who create, discuss and critique each other’s art as part of the process of enhancing their visual output. They are art professionals who use their visual exploration to inspire visual research, using the academic experience to build and enhance their understanding of and contribution to visual culture. Art becomes an equal partner in the academic disciplines of the academy as a bastion of research and innovation within society. 

‘Taking Art Seriously’ means we understand not just its creative potential, but how we can use its research knowledge to contribute, parallel to other disciplines, in the development of culture.

from

http://www.artandeducation.net/papers/view/21

Drawing Observing Seeing and Learning

Natural Languages        
Verbal = talking, singing,  
Kinaesthetic = the body – movment, dance

Visual = mark making seeing/ drawing

These languages, or intelligences are essentially communicating tools or connecting tools. Consider mark making or in its early state; scribbling …. it becomes drawing/ writing and these grow in sophistication with practise. Similarly, fine motor skills, the ability to verbalise complex ideas etc develop. Without practise, these abilities do not grow.  If we practice writing, swimming, playing an instrument etc our skills grow – it is the same with art making.

We approach visual art as an education tool. In essence art is about seeing – the physical act of seeing and also in the sense of making sense of the world… when we make sense of something we fit it into our growing understanding of our world … we say ‘I see’ when we create those networks of understanding in our minds and when links are made in this way, our brain actually grows.

Art is most closely linked to Science – it is an investigation tool for learning. It involves the student in learning to see; making meaning from what is seen, making tangible images and objects that communicate ideas to herself and others. It is a feedback loop, and because we think in images and we think in words, in Art lessons teachers encourage students to make, talk about and present their work. As they move through the school, this is extended into keeping a Visual Diary where students reflect on the process of making Art. 

Art is a visual language. 
It has a vocabulary and a grammar. However, unlike the written word, it is about seeing the whole at once rather than creating a narrative.

Imagination is no mere ornament, nor is art.'  Eisner 

Elliot Eisner is a revered art educator – he is Professor of Education and Art Stanford University and Chair, Curriculum Studies & Teacher Education. His book: The Arts and the Creation of Mind, Yale University Press,2002  is an excellent resource for understanding how children learn through the arts. Eisner came up with 7 modes of thinking, in advance of Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences and he worked with Gardner in forming his theory.

www.infed.org/biblio/eisner_arts_and_the_practice_or_education.htm .

The following is from an essay by Marvin Bartel, Ed.D. © 2003

Visual observation is believed to be in the domain of the right side of the brain. Intuitive and creative thinking are also believed to be in the domain of the right brain.  The left brain deals with the rational, the alphabet, numerals, and so on.  Left brain thinking is linear - one thing after another. The right brain processes everything at once.

A sensitive man's lessons on how to draw influenced by Betty Edwards' Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain

http://www.goshen.edu/art/ed/drawingskills.html#gesture

Lessons without limitations are not very effective.  Without limitations, students are prone to fall back on easy left brain habits and fail to practice new or difficult skills.  We naturally avoid the risk of doing the unknown unless a good teacher assures us that the new way can help us grow.  Well planned lesson limitations make it harder for the left brain to dominate while encouraging the right brian to practice.  On the other hand, children who are encouraged and limited to follow patterns, color in other people's lines, do copy work, or assemble pre designed projects are learning skills that would be desirable in a society that needs lots of slaves.  Teaching from "how to draw it"  books and by assigning copywork and patterns can be done by clerks.  Anybody can handout handwork.  In a society that needs self-motivated decision makers, their students will grow up to suffer "learned helplessness".  Good lesson limitations require individual learning of new skills, compositional and content choice making, challenging thinking tasks, and prohibition of stereotyping and prejudices.  See this link for more ideas on making it harder for the left brain to prevent the education of the right brain.

Global Learning Environments for Neo-Millenials

"I just wish I had a projector on my head and you had a screen on yours and then you would understand what I am trying to tell you” (9 year old)

Chris Jordan

Does the medium matter?

follow the link to see the importance of the materials Jordan has chosen to use 
http://www.chrisjordan.com

 

Technology facilitates deeper engagement for the non-sequential learner

Rationale: Learning styles ~ The Non-Linear Learner 

A large percentage of our girls are visual spatial learners and this impacts on the way they engage in our classes.  Howard Gardner begins with the premise that each of us has an array of intelligences, each of equal value but differently developed, with which we make meaning of the world. If we can understand that people perceive things differently, it goes along way towards understanding how girls learn in our classrooms.

Body Kinaesthetic learning, Aural, Visual Spatial, Interpersonal. Naturalistic, Verbal/Linguistic, Intrapersonal are all ‘ways into’ understanding. The senses feed our perception of the world in which we live; through sensing; feeling, moving, hearing, smelling, touching, tasting and seeing we can enhance our awareness of the world.

Thinking in images is a powerful tool - 1/3 of the population thinks in images. Images are WHOLE messages in one, they contain meaning and they make meaning. Most school subjects are geared to 'instruct' PART to WHOLE - a way of thinking about learning that negates the experiences of about 1/3 of students, according to Linda Silverman. To make an image or read an image requires a certain ability to trust the instincts.

Ref Silverman, L. Upside-Down Brilliance: The Visual-Spatial Learner

In From sequential to global: Exploring the landscapes of neomillennial*learners Julie Willems has this to say; "... educators and designers should consider creating balanced learning environments which include
both sequential and global learning opportunities for neomillennials ..." 

* neo-millennials - born after 1994  involved in immersive e-learning environments

Julie Willems School of Humanities, Communications and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts Monash University

Educational Tools used across the Visual Arts Faculty  
The Blog

Courtney Martin

Lillly Fox
Chloe Hunt

Ali-Rose Hobbs 

Brittany Croft

Staff links to Professional Reading etc

Other Ways of Knowing Blog ~ Visual Intelligence

The Wiki

arti  ~ www.arti.pbwiki.com

Website

GoSHA

Blackboard
Youtube publishing 
iTunes

Examples from the various Year Levels

Year 7

Smartboard as Drawing board … its all about the markmaking
Using the Smartboard ~ music, sounds, marks

Synaesthesia links in Blackboard
Music, visuals, artworks 

Year 8

Photoshop and other play things - making 'self dolls' photograph them and place into new virtual environments

Gardner's Multiple Intelligence Test to learn about themself    Test

example: Brittany Croft's Graph

Year 9

Research, Reflection and Resolution tools on Blackboard

Queensland Art Gallery Ed Resources

Powerpoint to inspire with examples for 'my little book of jewels' artist book

Year 10

Blackboard

Year 11

Synaesthesia examples ~ student work
podcasts eg Nadia
Self Knowledge tools Myers Briggs 
iTunes - synaesthesia music

Year 12
Sze Sze and Christina's analysis and interpretation of their digital Bodies of Work

Presentation of submissions to QSA

Bill Viola ~ Ocean without a Shore (information)